Cybersecurity governance
Diagnosis, risk matrix, policies, procedures, roadmap, technical controls and preparation for cybersecurity obligations.
Common references: Law 21.663, NIST CSF, CIS Controls, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27002 and Zero Trust.
Technology compliance
Governance, privacy, cybersecurity and technical evidence to operate with greater control against regulations and standards.
Governance, Risk & Compliance
We prepare technology to comply, demonstrate and sustain controls
We help organizations turn regulatory, contractual and security requirements into technical controls, verifiable processes and reusable evidence.
The focus is not to produce isolated documents. We integrate privacy, cybersecurity, secure development, architecture, operations and traceability so compliance is sustained within the real engineering lifecycle.
Readiness & Implementation
We assess gaps, prioritize risks, design controls and support the technical implementation of improvements.
Service scope
Compliance applied to systems, applications, data and infrastructure
We work at the point where standards become execution: architecture, controls, evidence, processes, automation and operations.
Privacy and personal data
Data inventory, data mapping, classification, legal bases for processing, retention, consent management, third parties and privacy controls.
Considers current Law 19.628 and preparation for Law 21.719, with deferred effectiveness on December 1, 2026.
Secure development and AppSec
Secure SDLC, Definition of Done, security gates, vulnerability management, dependencies, secrets, repositories, releases and architecture reviews.
Aligned with NIST SSDF, OWASP SAMM, OWASP ASVS, OWASP Top 10 and DevSecOps good practices.
AI, cloud and platforms
AI governance, risk assessment, traceability, providers, agent security, cloud controls, configuration, IAM, containers and observability.
References: ISO/IEC 42001, ISO/IEC 23894, NIST AI RMF, OWASP GenAI, CIS Benchmarks and PCI DSS when applicable.
Methodology
From regulatory gap to executable plan
Compliance readiness is not solved with a list of documents. It requires architecture decisions, accountable owners, measurable controls and technical evidence.
1. Diagnosis and context
We identify assets, systems, data flows, integrations, processes, providers, risks and applicable obligations.
2. Gap assessment
We compare the current state against regulatory frameworks, standards, internal controls and contractual commitments.
3. Prioritized roadmap
We organize gaps by risk, effort, impact, technical dependency, regulatory urgency and operational value.
4. Control design
We define technical controls, procedures, accountable owners, evidence, automations and acceptance criteria.
5. Implementation
We support or execute improvements in applications, pipelines, cloud, IAM, logging, monitoring, data, security and processes.
6. Evidence and follow-up
We prepare reports, technical evidence, dashboards, remediation backlog and continuous improvement mechanisms.
Chilean laws
Readiness for Law 21.663 and Law 21.719
Cybersecurity Framework Law 21.663
We support organizations that need to organize cybersecurity management, operational continuity, action records, incident response, technical controls and evidence for supervision or audit scenarios.
Personal Data Law 21.719
We prepare privacy and data protection capabilities: inventories, processing activities, classification, flows, third parties, security measures, retention, data subject rights and operational governance.
Deliverables
Concrete results for decision and execution
- Map of obligations, controls and prioritized gaps.
- Technical inventory of assets, applications, data, integrations and providers.
- Risk matrix, remediation roadmap and actionable backlog.
- Design or improvement of policies, procedures and technical control criteria.
- Technical evidence for audit, committee, provider, client or internal process.
- Architecture, hardening, monitoring, traceability and automation recommendations.
Reference frameworks
Standards that help turn compliance into engineering
ISO/IEC 27001
Security management system, controls, evidence, continuous improvement and governance.
NIST CSF
Cybersecurity governance and risk management with executive and technical language.
NIST SSDF
Secure development practices that can be integrated into the SDLC and supply chain.
OWASP SAMM / ASVS
Secure development maturity and verifiable controls for applications.
CIS Controls
Prioritized controls to reduce operational and technical exposure.
ISO/IEC 42001
Governance of artificial intelligence systems, risks, responsibilities and control.
Important criterion
We do not certify. We prepare, implement and leave evidence.
DrawCoders can perform assessments, independent reviews, gap analysis, control implementation, audit readiness and technical remediation support.
Formal certification, when applicable, must be issued by certification bodies, external auditors or competent entities according to the applicable framework.
Use cases
When to start a compliance assessment
New regulatory obligation
You need to know what applies, what gaps exist and which controls must be prioritized before a critical date.
A client requires evidence
A client, partner or provider requests policies, controls, security results, reports or governance proof.
Critical technology without traceability
There are important systems, APIs, data, pipelines or infrastructure, but there is not enough evidence of controls and responsibilities.
Audit or due diligence
The organization needs to organize gaps, risks, evidence and remediation before an internal, external or commercial review.
Contact us
Tell us what you need to build, modernize or protect
Fill in your details and we will schedule an initial conversation to understand your technical challenge.
Contact an expert
- Software development, cloud platforms, AI, automation and security.
- Initial review with no commitment to identify scope, risks and next steps.
- (SLA) We respond in less than 4 business hours.